Destroying Space Command

In The Washington Times: Biden’s political play for Colorado hurts national security

In disregard of basic military strategy and national security, this week President Biden overturned a major Air Force basing decision. Just as he did in Afghanistan by picking a withdrawal date based on PR rather than his top general’s best military advice, the president’s wrongheaded political calculations will once again leave our military with chaos. 

For more than two years, the administration has slow-rolled the headquarters decision for U.S. Space Command (SPACECOM), one of America’s 11 unified combatant commands in the Department of Defense.

Our combatant commands play a vital role in the defense of the nation, and SPACECOM’s mission is to defend the highest of high ground. 

After all, a war with China would likely start in space. 

Imagine: a major gas pipeline fueling the Northeast seizes up, forcing Pentagon employees to work from home. E-commerce freezes for a week, causing gridlock and a sudden stock market slide. America’s aging GPS satellite constellation is corrupted, blinding both ordinary civilians’ our military’s ability to navigate on land and sea.

These are just a few actions a technologically-sophisticated nation could take to blindside the U.S. There are thousands more. 

Since so much of our modern society relies on space, Congress and President Trump created Space Force and reconstituted U.S. Space Command in August 2019.

Moving out smartly, in 2020, the U.S. Air Force conducted an extensive basing-decision process, evaluating where to put SPACECOM’s headquarters. The air force looked at 66 communities in 26 states, ultimately narrowing it to six finalists. The top three were 1. Redstone Arsenal, Ala., 2. Offutt Air Force Base, Neb. and 3. Port San Antonio, Tex.

After the 2020 election, two finalists were taken to the White House: Redstone Arsenal and Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, Col. This was odd. How did a base that wasn’t in the top three make it to the president’s desk?

Chalk that up to sibling rivalry. Colorado Springs is beloved to many Air Force officers as the home of the Air Force Academy. Redstone Arsenal is U.S. Army. No blue suiter wants to be on an army base.

Those briefing the president pointed out that Peterson is already home to Northern Command and NORAD. Locating yet another combatant command in the same geographic footprint made little strategic sense. Don’t put all your generals in one basket.

Following that logic and confirming its number-one status, President Trump picked Redstone Arsenal, Ala. on Jan. 13, 2021. 

Immediately, Colorado’s congressional delegation called foul, claiming the decision was political. This made little sense, as the political move would have been to name the base location before the 2020 election, not afterwards. And why pick ruby-red Alabama? A calculating politician counting up votes would have sooner chosen Colorado or Florida, two purple states with 10 and 30 electoral college votes, respectively.

But at the Colorado delegation’s demands, not one but two watchdog reports ensued. 

A wasted year of investigation revealed zilch. In 2022 the DoD Inspector General’s office found the selection of Redstone “complied with law and policy, and was reasonable in identifying Huntsville as the preferred permanent location.”

The General Accountability Office’s report likewise declared Redstone Arsenal was “the location with the most advantages in the final decision matrix.” What the GAO found fishy was the 11th-hour elevation of Peterson. 

Democrats then tried another stalling tactic. Senator Jeanne Shaheen attempted to require yet another evaluation of Redstone in June 2022, but was shot down in a bipartisan vote orchestrated by Alabama’s senior senator, Tommy Tuberville.

Out of any further options, the Biden administration then seized on a flimsy new reason to delay the base. “This is all about abortion politics,” an anonymous official told  NBC .

A chorus of Democrats chimed in, agreeing that abortions should play a role in strategic military basing decision. In March of this year, Colorado’s Michael Bennett and 36 other Senate Democrats urged the Pentagon to “take into consideration the consequence of locating new installations and missions in states that would adversely impact the reproductive rights of those required to work there.” The clear message: punish pro-life states at the expense of military readiness. 

Injecting the DoD with more domestic hot-button issues is sure to run afoul of Congressional Republicans. Expect Alabama’s Representative Mike Rogers, who serves as the powerful Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee to zero out Space Command’s headquarters budget and raise investigations of his own. This might delay SPACECOM’s headquarters for another year or more.

The administration’s bare-knuckle move also ensures that Senator Tuberville’s hold on generals and admirals will likely continue through the 2024 election. That’s probably exactly what team Biden wants—a general election fight over abortion. They saw it as a winning issue in the midterms and hope the same magic might help the frail and fumbling president win reelection.

So sadly, yes, the SPACECOM fight is all about politics. Meanwhile, our enemies are at the space gate.

—Morgan Murphy @morganwwmurphy